THE CONSTITUTION PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. CORTES et al

Filing 29

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 7/16/10. 7/16/10 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
THE CONSTITUTION PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. CORTES et al Doc. 29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA T H E CONSTITUTION PARTY OF, P E N N S Y L V A N IA , et al. P la in tif f s v. P E D R O A. CORTES, et al. D e f e n d a n ts : : : : : : : : Civil Case N o . 5:09-cv-01691 ORDER A N D NOW, this 16th day of July, 2010, upon consideration of plaintiffs' motion f o r reconsideration of the court's opinion and order granting defendants' motions to d is m is s (Doc. # 25), brief of the justices of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the J u d g e s of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, Charles W. Johns, Propthonotary of th e Supreme Court, and Michael F. Krimmel, Chief Clerk of the Commonwealth Court of P e n n sylv a n ia in opposition to plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration (Doc. # 26), and brief o f defendants Cortes, Harhut and Corbett in opposition to plaintiffs' motion for re c o n s id e ra tio n (Doc. # 27), it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion is DENIED f o r the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum. B Y THE COURT: /s/ LAWRENCE F. STENGEL LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?