MAY v. SHINSEKI
ORDER THAT, PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(H)(3), BECAUSE THIS COURT LACKS SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THIS CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILE IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS M. GOLDEN ON 1/14/10. 1/15/10 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CAROL V. MAY, Plaintiff
vs. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Defendant
: : : : : : :
ORDER AND NOW, this 14th day of January, 2010, it is ORDERED that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3), because this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice to refile in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT:
/s/ Thomas M. Golden THOMAS M. GOLDEN, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?