MILLER v. CADMUS COMMUNICATIONS, A CENVEO COMPANY

Filing 19

OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT CADMUS COMMUNICATIONS, A CENVEO COMPANY'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT COUNTS I AND II OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT SHALL HAVE UNTIL ON OR BEFORE MARCH 20, 2010 TO ANSWER COUNT III OF THE COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 2/28/10. 3/2/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(ky, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT MILLER, Plaintiff vs. CADMUS COMMUNICATIONS, A CENVEO COMPANY, Defendant ) ) Civil Action ) No. 09-cv-02869 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER NOW, this 28th day of February, 2010, upon consideration of Defendant Cadmus Communications, a Cenveo Company's Motion to Dismiss filed July 2, 2009; upon consideration of Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, which memorandum in opposition was filed August 3, 2009; and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Cadmus Communications, a Cenveo Company's Motion to Dismiss is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Counts I and II of plaintiff's Complaint are dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant shall have until on or before March 20, 2010 to answer Count III of the Complaint. BY THE COURT:

/s/ James Knoll Gardner James Knoll Gardner United States District Judge