VOSBURGH-AUSTIN v. ASTRUE

Filing 20

ORDER THAT THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT IS APPROVED AND HIS RECOMMENDATION IS ADOPTED. THE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; AND THIS CASE IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 9/13/2010. 9/14/2010 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(tomg, )

Download PDF
VOSBURGH-AUSTIN v. ASTRUE Do c. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARSHA GAIL VOSBURGH-AUSTIN v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2010, upon consideration of the plaintiff's Request for Review (Document No. 13), the defendant's response (Document No. 16), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Arnold C. Rapoport (Document No. 19), the lack of any objection to the Report and Recommendation, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. ADOPTED; 2. PART; and 3. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further The plaintiff's Request for Review is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN The Magistrate Judge's Report is APPROVED and his Recommendation is CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-3263 proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation, pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). s/Timothy J. Savage TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?