PHELPS v. ROZUM et al
ORDER AS FOLLOWS: THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LEGROME D. DAVIS ON 1/6/09. 1/7/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NATHAN PHELPS v. GERALD ROZUM, et al.
: : : : :
ORDER AND NOW, this 6th day of January 2010, upon consideration of Petitioner's Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief (Doc. No. 1), Respondents' Response thereto (Doc. No. 7), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart (Doc. No. 11), and Petitioner's Objections thereto (Doc. No. 12), it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. 2. 3. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED; The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED; A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue, in that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and because reasonable jurists would not find the correctness of the procedural aspects of this decision debatable. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); and The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT: /S/LEGROME D. DAVIS Legrome D. Davis, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?