THOMPSON v. MED-MIZER, INC. et al

Filing 86

MEMORANDUM/ORDER THAT DEFENDANT MED-MIZER, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO COUNT II OF PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS, DEFENDANT MED-MIZER, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE HENRY S. PERKIN ON 11/30/12. 11/30/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
____________________________________
CHARLES THOMPSON,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
vs.
:
:
MED-MIZER, INC.
:
:
Defendant. :

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-CV-2058

ORDER
AND NOW, this

30th

day of November, 2012, upon consideration of

Defendant Med-Mizer, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 73) filed on October 15,
2012, Plaintiff Thompson’s Reply to Motion of Med-Mizer, Inc. for Summary Judgment (Dkt.
No. 76) filed on November 2, 2012, Defendant Med-Mizer, Inc.’s Reply Brief to Plaintiff’s
Reply to Med-Mizer’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 82) filed on November 19, 2012;
and for the reasons expressed in the foregoing Memorandum,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Med-Mizer, Inc.’s Motion for Summary
Judgment is GRANTED with respect to Count II of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. In
all other respects, Defendant Med-Mizer, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Henry S. Perkin
HENRY S. PERKIN
United States Magistrate Judge