RIECHERT et al v. ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE
ORDER THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFTS ELIZABETHTOWN COLLEGE, CARROLL TYMINSKI, MIMI STAULTERS, RACHEL FINELY-BOWMAN, MARIE CALENDA, SUSAN TRAVERSO, AND SUSAN PITCHER AND AGAINST PLFF CHRISTOPHER REICHERT. DEFTS' MOTION IN LIMINE TO EX CLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY OF CASEY DIXON (DOC #47) IS DENIED. PLFF'S FINAL PRETRIAL MOTION FOR JUDGMENT (DOC #50) IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. ( SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 4/10/12. ) 4/11/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHRISTOPHER J. REICHERT,
AND NOW, this 10th day of April, 2012, upon consideration of the parties’ Proposed
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Document Nos. 48, 49) and Amended Proposed
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Document Nos. 69, 71), following a bench trial from
January 9, 2012 through January 12, 2012, and for the reasons stated in this Court’s
Memorandum dated April 10, 2012, it is hereby ORDERED that:
Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Elizabethtown College, Carroll
Tyminski, Mimi Staulters, Rachel Finley-Bowman, Marie Calenda, Susan
Traverso, and Susan Pitcher and against Plaintiff Christopher Reichert.
Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony of Casey Dixon
(Document No. 47) is DENIED.
Plaintiff’s Final Pretrial Motion for Judgment (Document No. 50) is DENIED.
The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
BY THE COURT:
Berle M. Schiller, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?