HARPER v. FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE (F&M) et al

Filing 16

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS LANCASTER BUREAU OF POLICE AND OFFICER JOHN DOE'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED, AND DEFENDANTS LANCASTER BUREAU OF POLICE AND OFFICER JOHN DOE ARE DISMISSED AS DEFENDANTS IN THIS CASE; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 3/30/11. 3/30/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(jl, )

HARPER v. FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE (F&M) et al

Doc. 16

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RONALD P. HARPER, JR., Plaintiff, v. FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : :

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2647

ORDER AND NOW, this 30th day of March 2011, upon consideration of Defendants Lancaster Bureau of Police and Officer John Doe's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 5), Plaintiffs failure to respond to the Motion for over a six month period, and in accordance with the Opinion of this Court dated March 30, 2011, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 5) is GRANTED, and Defendants Lancaster Bureau of Police and Officer John Doe are dismissed as defendants in this case.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Joel H. Slomsky, J. JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

Dockets.Justia.com