HARPER v. FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE (F&M) et al

Filing 18

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS ARE GRANTED, THE CASE IS DISMISSED, AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 7/13/11. 7/14/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(jl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RONALD P. HARPER, JR., Plaintiff, v. FRANKLIN & MARSHALL COLLEGE, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2647 ORDER AND NOW, this 13th day of July 2011, upon consideration of F&M Employee Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 8), F&M Security Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 9), Defendant Barley Snyder LLC’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 13), Plaintiff’s failure to respond to the Motions for over a six month period, and in accordance with the Opinion of this Court dated July 13, 2011, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 8, 9, 13) are GRANTED, the case is DISMISSED, and the Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: /s/ Joel H. Slomsky, J. JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?