RAUCH v. ASTRUE

Filing 18

ORDER THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF, REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS REMAND ONLY AND THE RELIEF SOUGHT BY PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT THAT THE MATTER IS REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS ADJUDICATION AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS HEREBY ORDERED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LOWELL A. REED, JR ON 4/18/2011. 4/19/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAVID LEE RAUCH, JR. v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2779 MICHAELJ. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security ORDER AND NOW, this 18th day of April, 2011, upon consideration ofthe brief in support of request for review filed by plaintiff (Doc. No. 11), defendant's response and plaintiffs reply thereto (Doc. Nos. 15 & 16) and having found after careful and independent consideration of the record that I am unable to find that the ALl's decision is supported by substantial evidence, it is concluded that the action must be remanded to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g). Therefore, for the reasons set forth in the memorandum above, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF, REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY for the purposes of this remand only and the relief sought by Plaintiff is GRANTED to the extent that the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this adjudication; and 2. The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to mark this case closed.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?