STROUD v. BOORSTEIN et al
Filing
24
ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS GRANTED. THE COURT'[S NOVEMBER 30, 2011 ORDER DISMISSING PLFF'S COMPLAINT IS VACATED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL REOPEN THIS CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 1/31/12. 2/1/12 ENTERED AND COPIES FAXED TO COUNSEL AND CERTIFIED MAIL TO PRO SE BY CHAMBERS.(lvj, ) Modified on 2/1/2012 (lvj, ). Modified on 2/1/2012 (lvj, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STEVEN STROUD
:
:
:
:
:
:
v.
RYAN BOORSTEIN, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 10-3355
ORDER
AND NOW, this
31st
day of
January
, 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s
Motion for Reconsideration of Court’s Order Dated November 30, 2011 (ECF No. 21), and all
papers submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED.
2.
The Court’s November 30, 2011 Order dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint is
VACATED.
3.
The Clerk of Court shall reopen this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?