GOULD v. WALSH et al

Filing 10

ORDER: THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED; AND, THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 7/26/11. 7/27/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CARL ERIC GOULD
v.
SUPERINTENDENT
JEROME WALSH, et al.

:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
No. 10-3370

ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2011, upon careful and independent consideration of
Petitioner Carl Eric Gould’s pro se Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and
after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge L. Felipe
Restrepo, to which no objections have been filed,1 it is ORDERED:
1.

The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2.

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED;

3.

There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability; and,

4.

The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Juan R. Sánchez
Juan R. Sánchez, J.

1

The Report and Recommendation was sent to all parties of record on June 24, 2011. Pursuant to
Local Civil Rule 72.1 IV(b), a party may object to a magistrate judge’s report “within fourteen (14)
days after being served with a copy thereof.” As of today’s date, no objections have been filed.