FOOD TEAM INTERNATIONAL, LTD. v. UNILINK, LLC et al
Filing
86
VERDICT: ON PLAINTIFF'S NON-PACA-TRUST CLAIMS1 FOR FAILURE TO PAY INVOICES 1008, 1015, AND 4111, I FIND IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF FOOD TEAM INTERNATIONAL, LTD, AND AGAINST DEFENDANT UNILINK, LLC IN THE AMOUNT OF $23,281.75, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 9/30/13. 10/1/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
FOOD TEAM INTERNATIONAL, LTD,
Plaintiff
v.
UNILINK, LLC,
GARY GREGORY,
MARC BEHAEGEL, and
AKBAR BOUTARABI,
Defendants
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action
No. 10-cv-03584
VERDICT
NOW, this 30th day of September, 2013, after trial
without jury before the undersigned on May 18, 21-22, and 24,
2012; and based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law,
and Discussion contained in the accompanying Adjudication, I
find as follows:
On plaintiff’s non-PACA-trust claims 1 for failure to
pay invoices 1008, 1015, and 4111, I find in favor of plaintiff
Food Team International, LTD, and against defendant Unilink, LLC
in the amount of $23,281.75.
On plaintiff’s claim for wrongful repudiation
concerning yet-to-be-shipped broccoli and cauliflower, I find in
1
See Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (“PACA”), 7 U.S.C.
§§ 499a-499t.
favor of plaintiff Food Team International, LTD and against
defendant Unilink, LLC in the amount of $23,794.73.
On plaintiff’s non-PACA-trust claims for failure to
pay, I find in favor of defendants Gary Gregory, Marc Behaegel,
and Akbar Boutarabi and against plaintiff Food Team International, LTD.
On the Second Counterclaim asserted by defendant
Unilink, LLC for breach of contract in supplying defective
produce, I find in favor of plaintiff Food Team International,
LTD and against defendant Unilink, LLC.
BY THE COURT:
_/s/ JAMES KNOLL GARDNER __
James Knoll Gardner
United States District Judge
-ii-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?