CRUZ-SMITH v. SINCLAIR et al

Filing 16

MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN 9/19/2011. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 8/18/2011. 8/19/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ems)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA VANESSA CRUZ-SMITH v. MICHAEL SINCLAIR, et al. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 10-3609 ORDER AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2011, it is ORDERED Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Document 10) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is granted insofar as (1) Plaintiff Vanessa Cruz-Smith’s First Amendment retaliation claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED without prejudice against all Defendants; (2) Cruz-Smith’s § 1983 equal protection claims against Thomas Trachta, Frederick Lahovski, and the Borough of Nazareth are DISMISSED without prejudice; and (3) Cruz-Smith’s demand for punitive damages under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act is STRICKEN. The motion is otherwise denied. It is further ORDERED Plaintiff may file an amended complaint no later than September 19, 2011. BY THE COURT: /s/ Juan R. Sánchez Juan R. Sánchez, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?