JARZYNA v. HOME PROPERTIES, L.P. et al

Filing 371

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASSS 287 IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ALLOW 362 IS DENIED, ETC. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL 353 IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 05/15/2017. 05/15/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(nds)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARIUSZ G. JARZYNA,
Plaintiff,
v.
HOME PROPERTIES, L.P. et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 10-4191

O R D E R
AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2017, upon consideration
of Plaintiff’s Motion to Certify Class (ECF No. 287) and Defendant
Fair Collections and Outsourcing, Inc.’s response in opposition
thereto (ECF No. 292); Plaintiff’s Motion for Directed Order as to
Class Certification (ECF No. 319) and Defendant Fair Collections
and Outsourcing, Inc.’s response in opposition thereto (ECF No.
326); Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production (ECF No. 353);
Defendant Fair Collections and Outsourcing, Inc.’s Motion to Strike
Part of Testimony (ECF No. 363); Plaintiff’s Supplemental
Memorandum in Support of Motion to Certify Class (ECF No. 355) and
Defendant Fair Collections and Outsourcing, Inc.’s Supplemental
Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Certify Class
(ECF No. 364); Plaintiff’s Motion to Reinstate Judgments and Claims
and for Sanctions (ECF No. 356) and Defendant Fair Collections and
Outsourcing, Inc.’s response in opposition thereto (ECF No. 360);
and Plaintiff’s Motion to Allow Plaintiff’s Reply Memorandum to
Defendant Fair Collections and Outsourcing, Inc.’s Opposition to

Plaintiff’s Motion to Reinstate Judgments and Claims and for
Sanctions (ECF No. 362); and following a hearing held on the record
with counsel for both parties on October 17, 2016, and for the
reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED
as follows:
1.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Certify Class (ECF No. 287) is

2.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Directed Order as to Class

DENIED.

Certification (ECF No. 319) is DENIED.
3.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Allow Plaintiff’s Reply

Memorandum to Defendant Fair Collections and Outsourcing, Inc.’s
Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Reinstate Judgments and Claims
and for Sanctions (ECF No. 362) is DENIED.1
4.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Production (ECF No.

353) and Defendant Fair Collections and Outsourcing, Inc.’s Motion
to Strike Part of Testimony (ECF No. 363) are DENIED as moot.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO,
J.

1

The Court considered the contents of Plaintiff’s proposed
reply memorandum, attached to the motion, in disposing of all
motions addressed in this order.
2