GRIFFIN et al v. MILLER et al

Filing 18

MEMORANDUM/OPINION THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFFS GRIFFIN, RINGGOLD AND BOYER SHALL HAVE UNTIL 11/30/11 TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT TO PROVIDE A MOR E DEFINITE STATEMENT OF THEIR FAIR HOUSING ACT CLAIMS AGAINST THE FOUR INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS, SANDRA MILLER, BENNO RUHNKE, TANYA NELSON AND DIEDRE DURHAM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACCOMPANYING OPINION. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 9/24/11. 9/26/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE'S AND E-MAILED.(ky, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MONICA GRIFFIN;
SHABRE RINGGOLD;
ISAIAH BOYER;
D.C., JR.;
C.C.; and
E.C.,
Plaintiffs
vs.
BERKS COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY;
SANDRA MILLER;
BENNO RUHNKE;
TANYA NELSON; and
DEIDRE DURHAM,
Defendants
*

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
*

Civil Action
No. 10-cv-05740

*

APPEARANCES:
MONICA GRIFFIN
SHABRE RINGGOLD
ISAIAH BOYER
D.C., JR.
C.C.
E.C.
Plaintiffs pro se
S. WHITNEY RAHMAN, ESQUIRE
On behalf of Defendants
*

*

*

O P I N I O N
JAMES KNOLL GARDNER,
United States District Judge
This matter is before the court on Defendants’ Motion
to Dismiss the Complaint and/or for Summary Judgment, which
motion was filed together with a memorandum of law in support on
February 11, 2011.

Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion

to Dismiss the Complaint and/or for Summary Judgment
(“Plaintiffs’ Opposition”) was filed together with a memorandum