GRIFFIN et al v. MILLER et al

Filing 19

MEMORANDUM/ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFF SHALL HAVE UNTIL 11/30/11 TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 9/24/11. 9/26/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO PRO SE'.(ky, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MONICA GRIFFIN;
SHABRE RINGGOLD;
ISAIAH BOYER;
D.C., JR.;
C.C.; and
E.C.,
Plaintiffs
vs.
BERKS COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY;
SANDRA MILLER;
BENNO RUHNKE;
TANYA NELSON; and
DEIDRE DURHAM,
Defendants

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action
No. 10-cv-05740

O R D E R
NOW, this 24th day of September, 2011, upon
consideration of the following documents:
(1)

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Complaint
and/or for Summary Judgment, which motion was
filed February 11, 2011 (Document 7);
together with
Defendants’ Memorandum in Support of
Their Motion to Dismiss the Complaint,
and/or for Summary Judgment, which
memorandum was filed February 11, 2011
(Document 7-2); and

(2)

Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendants’ Motion
to Dismiss the Complaint and/or for Summary
Judgment, which opposition was filed May 31,
2011 (Document 17); together with
Plaintiffs[’] Memorandum in Opposition
of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and/or
for Summary Judgment, which memorandum
was filed May 31, 2011 (Document 17),

upon review of plaintiffs’ Complaint filed November 15, 2010,
(Document 3); and for the reasons expressed in the accompanying
Opinion,