COLLAZO v. THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER et al
Filing
62
ORDER THAT THE 36 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED.R.C.P. 56 OF DEFENDANTS THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER, LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON BOARD AND LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT COUNT I IS DISMISSED FROM PLAINTIFFS COM PLAINT FOR DEPRIVATION OF LEGAL RIGHTS. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER, LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON BOARD AND LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF MARIALISA COLLAZO. IT IS FURTHER OR DERED THAT PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT JANE DOES 1-16 ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 8/31/12. 8/31/12 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (mas, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARIA LISA COLLAZO,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff
v.
THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER,
LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON BOARD,
LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, and
JANE DOES 1-16,
Defendants
*
*
Civil Action
No. 10-cv-07010
*
O R D E R
NOW, this 31st day of August, 2012, upon consideration
of the following documents:
(1)
Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.C.P.
56 of Defendants The County of Lancaster, Lancaster County Prison Board and Lancaster County
Prison, filed on May 2, 2012 (Document 36),
together with;
(A)
(B)
(2)
Memorandum of Law in Support of the
Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to
Fed.R.C.P. 56 of Defendants County of
Lancaster, Lancaster County Prison Board
and Lancaster County Prison (Document
36), together with;
Statement of Undisputed Material Facts
in Support of the Motion for Summary
Judgment Pursuant to Fed.R.C.P. 56 of
Defendants County of Lancaster,
Lancaster County Prison Board and
Lancaster County Prison (Document 35);
Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the
Motion for Summary Judgment Filed by Defendants
County of Lancaster, Lancaster County Prison Board
and Lancaster County Prison, which memorandum was
filed May 17, 2012 (Document 37), together with;
(A)
Plaintiff’s Counter-Statement of
Undisputed Material Facts in Opposition
to the Motion for Summary Judgment Filed
by Defendants’ Pursuant to Fed.R.C.P. 56
(Document 37-1);
(3)
Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the
Motion for Summary Judgment Filed by Defendants
County of Lancaster, Lancaster County Prison Board
and Lancaster County Prison, which memorandum was
filed May 22, 2012 (Document 40) (corrected
version);
(4)
Defendants’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, which
reply was filed June 25, 2012 (Document 43);
(5)
Plaintiff’s Surreply to Defendants’ Reply That
Defendants Filed in Support of Their Motion for
Summary Judgment, which surreply was filed
July 17, 2012 (Document 48);
upon consideration of the pleadings, exhibits, depositions and
record papers; and for the reasons articulated in the
accompanying Opinion,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment
Pursuant to Fed.R.C.P. 56 of Defendants The County of Lancaster,
Lancaster County Prison Board and Lancaster County Prison is
granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Count I is dismissed from
plaintiff’s Complaint for Deprivation of Legal Rights.1
1
Plaintiff’s Complaint for Deprivation of Legal Rights was filed
December 21, 2010 (Document 1).
By my Order dated April 4, 2011 and filed April 6, 2011
(Document 25), I previously granted defendants’ motion to dismiss, and
dismissed, Count II from plaintiff’s complaint. In Count II, plaintiff
alleges that defendants violated her right under the Constitution and laws of
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to be free from unreasonable searches.
-ii-
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor
of defendants The County of Lancaster, Lancaster County Prison
Board and Lancaster County Prison and against plaintiff Maria
Lisa Collazo.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims against
defendant Jane Does 1-16 are dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall
close this case for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ JAMES KNOLL GARDNER
James Knoll Gardner
United States District Judge
-iii-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?