HINKLEY v. LEHIGH COUNTY et al

Filing 65

ORDER THAT PETITIOKNER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISS ED AND THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 10/16/12. 10/16/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RANDY CARL HINKLEY
v.
LEHIGH COUNTY, et al.

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
No. 11-909

ORDER
AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2012, upon careful and independent consideration of
Petitioner Randy Carl Hinkley’s pro se Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus,
and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K.
Caracappa and Hinkley’s objections thereto, it is ORDERED:
1.

Hinkley’s objections to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED;

2.

The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED for the reasons set
forth in the accompanying Memorandum;

3.

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED; and

4.

There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Juan R. Sánchez
Juan R. Sánchez, J.