ROGERS v. TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC.

Filing 32

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (DOC. 6) IS DENIED. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS ON CONSTITUTIONAL GROUNDS (DOC. 5) IS GRANTED. PLAINITFFS COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED THAT CASE SHALL BE MARKED CLOSED.SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 6/2/11. 6/3/11 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BRUCE A. ROGERS,

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Plaintiff,
v.
TRISTAR PRODUCTS, INC.,
Defendant.

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-1111

O R D E R
AND NOW, this 2nd day of June, 2011, it is hereby
ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a
claim (doc. no. 6) is DENIED;
It is hereby further ORDERED that Defendant’s motion to
dismiss on constitutional grounds (doc. no. 5) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s complaint is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice;
It is hereby further ORDERED that this case shall be
marked CLOSED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

S/Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.