FRAZIER v. EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES

Filing 12

MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. #9) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED IN THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 2/10/2012; 2/13/2012 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(tomg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
_____________________________________________
CRAIG FRAZIER,
:
Plaintiff,
:
v.
:
:
EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES,
:
Defendant.
:
_____________________________________________:

CIVIL ACTION
No. 11-1863

ORDER

AND NOW, this 10th day of February, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant, Exide
Technologies, “Motion to Dismiss In Part” (Doc. No. 9) and Plaintiff’s response thereto, and for
reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that
Defendant’s motion is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART as follows:
1.

Defendant’s motion regarding Plaintiff’s national origin and retaliation claims
(Count I) is DENIED; and

2.

Defendant’s motion regarding Plaintiff’s intentional infliction of emotional
distress claim (Count II) is GRANTED.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg
____________________________
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.

1