HALLMAN v. PPL CORPORATION

Filing 57

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT PPL CORPORATION AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF LORI HALLMAN ON PKAINTIFF'S SOLE REMAINING CLAIM IN PLAINTIFF'S S ECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED MARCH 13, 2012 FOR UNLAWFUL RETALIATION IN VIOLATION OF TITLE VII AND THE PENNSYLVANIA HUMAN RELATIONS ACT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 1/31/2014. 1/31/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(lbs, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LORI HALLMAN,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff
v.
PPL CORPORATION,
Defendant

Civil Action
No. 11-cv-02834

O R D E R
NOW, this 31st day of January, 2014, upon consideration
of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed August 30, 2013
(Document 35); upon consideration of the pleadings, record
papers, briefs and legal memorandum, and statements of
undisputed material facts of the parties in the within matter;
and for the reasons expressed in the accompanying Opinion,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in
favor of defendant PPL Corporation and against plaintiff Lori
Hallman on plaintiff’s sole remaining claim in plaintiff’s
Second Amended Complaint filed March 13, 2012 (Document 19) for
unlawful retaliation in violation of Title VII and the
Pennsylvania Human Relations Act.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall
mark this case closed for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ JAMES KNOLL GARDNER
_
James Knoll Gardner
United States District Judge