CRUZ-HERNANDEZ v. THOMAS et al

Filing 17

ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH ABOVE, THE PETITION IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT A HEARING; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WILL BE ISSUED PURSUANT TO 28 USC, SECTION 2253 BECAUSE PETITIONER HAS FAILED TO MA KE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT; THE CLERK OF COURT IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR ON 7/11/12. 7/12/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSE F. CRUZ-HERNANDEZ v. JOHN THOMAS, et al. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 11-2978 ORDER AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 2012, upon consideration of the Petition for Writof Habeas Corpus and the response thereto, I HEREBY ORDER that for the reasons set forth above, the Petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT A HEARING. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability will be issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2253 because petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of denial of a constitutional right. The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to mark this case closed. s/J. William Ditter, Jr. J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR., J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?