ASKEW v. R.L. REPPERT, INC. et al

Filing 142

ORDERTHAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 2/26/16. 2/26/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DERRICK ASKEW,
Plaintiff
v.
R.L. REPPERT, INC.,
RICHARD L. REPPERT,
R.L. REPPERT, INC. EMPLOYEES
PROFIT SHARING 401(k) PLAN,
R.L. REPPERT, INC. MONEY
PURCHASE PLAN (DAVIS BACON PLAN),
Defendants and
Third-Party Plaintiffs
v.
CALIFORNIA PENSION ADMINISTRATORS &
CONSULTANTS, INC.,
Third-Party Defendants

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action
No. 11-cv-04003

O R D E R
NOW, this 26th day of February, 2016, upon
consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration of Order
on Summary Judgment (“Motion for Reconsideration”), which Motion
for Reconsideration was filed February 19, 2016 (Document 134)
together with a memorandum of law in support and exhibits, and
Defendants and Third Party Plaintiffs R.L. Reppert Inc. et al’s
Response and Memorandum of Law to Plaintiff’s Motion for
Reconsideration on Summary Judgment, which response was filed on

February 24, 2016 (Document 139) together with Exhibit A, and
for the reasons expressed in the accompanying Opinion,
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion for
Reconsideration is denied.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ JAMES KNOLL GARDNER
James Knoll Gardner
United States District Judge

-ii-