BERETE v. CORTAZO et al
Filing
39
ORDER AS FOLLOWS: THE MOTION IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO PLFF'S FALSE ARREST, ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZURE, AND RACIAL PROFILING AND DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS AGAINST ALL DEFTS. THE MOTION IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO PLFF'S ASSAULT AND BATTERY CLAI MS AGAINST THE READING POLICE DEPARTMENT. THE MOTION IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO PLFF'S ASSAULT AND BATTERY CLAIMS AGAINST OFFICER CORTAZZO. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 12/18/12. 12/20/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(fb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MOHAMED SITA BERETE,
:
:
Plaintiff,
:
:
v.
:
:
OFFICER CHRISTOPHER CORTAZZO, :
and READING POLICE DEPT.,
:
:
Defendants.
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 11-cv-4111
ORDER
AND NOW, this
18th
day of December 2012, upon
consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
(Doc. Nos. 31 and 32), Plaintiff’s Response in opposition thereto
(Doc. No. 35), and Defendants’ Reply in further support thereof
(Doc. No. 36), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1) The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff’s false
arrest, illegal search and seizure, and racial profiling and
discrimination claims against all Defendants.
2) The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff’s assault
and battery claims against the Reading Police Department.
3) The Motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff’s assault
and battery claims against Officer Cortazzo.
BY THE COURT:
s/J. Curtis Joyner
J. CURTIS JOYNER, C.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?