PISKANIN v. CAMERON et al

Filing 110

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 10/16/14. 10/17/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.,
Petitioner,

CIVIL ACTION

v.
KENNETH P. CAMERON, et al.
Respondents.

AND NOW, this

\~

NO.

OCT

11-cv-4698

~~:c;

b:;'.

ORDER
dayof

o~

~~

:: ;.·:. '; ;u;-E, r.iark

"-'<'C- -. - · - • • -

, 2014, upon careful and

independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2254, and after ~ev\e~~~~~Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
\~ t)'J._.::i't,'°"".s ~TD
Judge Lynne A. Sitarski;\IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is
DENIED without an evidentiary hearing.
3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

BERLE M. SCHILLER,

J.

S 201L}

-·

••

~.;:_;~_~, 1~t:;~f\