GONZALEZ et al v. MOLDED ACOUSTICAL PRODUCTS OF EASTON, INC. et al

Filing 53

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE ADMISSION OF EEOC POSITION STATEMENTS ARE DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 3/27/13. 3/27/13 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
FERNANDO GONZALEZ, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
MOLDED ACOUSTICAL PRODUCTS
OF EASTON, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 11-5327

ORDER
AND NOW, this

27th

day of March 2013, upon consideration of the Defendants’

Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 44), Plaintiffs’ Response thereto (Doc. No. 45),
Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief (Doc. No. 46), Defendants’ Reply Brief
(Doc. No. 46, Ex. A), Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Preclude Admission of EEOC Position
Statements (Doc. No. 48), Plaintiffs’ Response thereto (Doc. No. 50), Defendants’ Motion for
Leave to File a Reply Brief (Doc. No. 51), and Defendants’ Reply (Doc. No. 51, Ex. A), IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendants’ Motions for Leave to File a Reply Brief (Doc. Nos. 46 & 51) are
GRANTED. Exhibits A to each motion shall be deemed FILED;
2. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 44) is GRANTED as to
Plaintiffs’ claim for punitive damages; Defendants’ Motion for Summary
Judgment is otherwise DENIED;
3. Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Preclude Admission of EEOC Position
Statements (Doc. No. 48) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.