OCHNER v. STEDMAN et al

Filing 39

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT MICHAEL HORAN'S MOTION TO DISMISS [#24] IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS DETECTIVE HEATHER HALSTEAD, LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, AND DETECTIIVE STEPHEN OWENS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT [#27] IS GRANTED; DEFENDANTS CRAIG STEDMAN AND BRIAN CHUDZIK'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND FAILURE TO PROPERLY SERVE DEFENDANTS [#28] IS GRANTED; AND PLAINTIFF DAVID OCHNER'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 3/14/13. 3/14/13 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS.[fdc]

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAVID OCHNER v. CRAIG STEDMAN, et al. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 11-6080 ORDER AND NOW, this 14th day of March, 2013, it is ORDERED: Defendant Michael Horan’s Motion to Dismiss (Document 24) is GRANTED; Defendants Detective Heather Halstead, Lancaster City Bureau of Police, and Detective Stephen Owens’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Document 27) is GRANTED; Defendants Craig Stedman and Brian Chudzik’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Failure to Properly Serve Defendants (Document 28) is GRANTED; and Plaintiff David Ochner’s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice against all Defendants. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark this case CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Juan R. Sánchez Juan R. Sánchez

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?