MARCHANTE v. AUTO ZONE, INC.

Filing 28

ORDER THAT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OFDEFENDANT AUTOZONE STORES[,]INC. IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S CIVIL ACTIONCOMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOROF DEFENDANT AUTO ZONE, INC., AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF FRANCISCO SANCHEZ MARCHANTE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 4/3/13. 4/4/13 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
FRANCISCO SANCHEZ MARCHANTE,
Plaintiff
vs.
AUTO ZONE, INC.,
Defendant

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action
No. 12-cv-00691

O R D E R
NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2013, upon consideration of
the following documents:
(1)

Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant AutoZone
Stores[,]Inc., filed September 20, 2012 together
with;
(A) Memorandum of Law in Support of the
Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendant
AutoZone Stores, Inc.; and
(B)

(2)

Defendant’s Statement of Facts;

Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment, which response was
filed October 2, 2012 together with;
(A)

Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law in
Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment;

upon consideration of the pleadings, exhibits, depositions and
record papers; and for the reasons articulated in the
accompanying Opinion,
IT IS ORDERED that Motion for Summary Judgment of
Defendant Autozone Stores[,]Inc. is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s Civil Action—
Complaint is dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor
of defendant Auto Zone, Inc., and against plaintiff Francisco
Sanchez Marchante.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall
close this case for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ JAMES KNOLL GARDNER
James Knoll Gardner
United States District Judge

-ii-