HENRY v. CITY OF ALLENTOWN et al

Filing 14

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 1/7/13. 1/8/13 ENTERED & E-MAILED.[fdc]

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LEIF HENRY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ALLENTOWN, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-1380 ORDER AND NOW, this 7th day of January 2013, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 5), Plaintiff’s Response thereto (Doc. No. 9), Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief (Doc. No. 10), and Defendants’ Reply (Doc. No. 10, Ex. A), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief is GRANTED. Defendants’ Reply, attached as Exhibit A to Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Reply Brief, shall be deemed filed. 2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, as follows: a. Counts I and II are dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff’s right to file a second amended complaint, within fourteen (14) days of this Order, stating plausible § 1981 discrimination and § 1983 procedural due process claims against Defendants City of Allentown and Maclean; b. Count III is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant MacLean; c. Count IV is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant MacLean but without prejudice to Plaintiff’s right to file a second amended complaint, within fourteen (14) days of this Order, stating a plausible ADA retaliation claim against Defendant City of Allentown. 3. Per my Order of August 27, 2012, discovery in this matter remains STAYED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?