MARTINS v. KERESTES et al

Filing 15

ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 12/13/13. 12/13/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(lvj, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ____________________________________ JUSTINO MARTINS, : CIVIL ACTION Petitioner : : v. : : JOHN KERESTES, et al., : No. 12-2724 Respondents. : ____________________________________: ORDER AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2013, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1), review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge (Doc. No. 10), and “Petitioner’s Objections to Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation” (Doc. No. 14), which was filed pro se, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED. 2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 3. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability. 5. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: /s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg ____________________________ MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?