THE CONSTITUTION PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. AICHELE et al

Filing 67

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS ON COUNTS I AND II. THE MOTION IS OTHERWISE DENIED. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS ON COUNT III. THE MOTHER IS OTHERWISE DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 7/23/15. 7/24/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THE CONSTITUTION PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. PEDRO CORTES, et. al. Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION 12-CV-2726 ORDER AND NOW this 23rd day of July 2015, upon consideration of plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, doc. no. 60, and defendants’ response thereto, doc. no. 63, and upon consideration of defendants’ motion for summary judgment, doc. no. 59, and plaintiffs’ response thereto, doc. no. 64, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, doc. no. 60, is GRANTED in part. Judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiffs on Counts I and II. The motion is otherwise DENIED. 2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, doc. no. 59, is GRANTED in part. Judgment is entered in favor of defendants on Count III. The motion is otherwise DENIED. BY THE COURT /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?