HARDING v. MEISEL et al

Filing 24

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. THE MOTIONS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND FOR BAIL ARE DISMISSED AS MOOT. THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILTY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 7/3/13. 7/3/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMES HARDING CIVIL ACTION v. DALE MEISEL, et al. NO. 12-4487 ORDER AND NOW, this 3~ay of~ 1 z_tJJJ, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and Respondents' Motion to dismiss the petition as moot, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED AS MOOT. 3. The motions for appointment of counsel and for bail are DISMISSED AS MOOT. 3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. BY THE COURT: ~L~s?~

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?