PEREZ v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE

Filing 17

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE HONORABLE ELIZABETH T. HEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. NO. 16) IS ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. THE COMMISSIONER'S DECISION DENYING PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION FOR DIB AND SSI IS AFFIRMED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 4/21/2014. 4/22/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (aeg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DACIO PEREZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION NO.:

12-CV-5570-CDJ

ORDER
AND NOW, this 21st day of April, 2014, it is hereby ORDERED:
1.)

the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Elizabeth T. Hey, United States
Magistrate Judge, (Doc. No. 16), is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY;1

2.)

The Commissioner’s decision denying Plaintiff’s application for DIB and SSI is
AFFIRMED;

3.)

The clerk of court is directed to CLOSE THE CASE for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ C. Darnell Jones, II J.
C. DARNELL JONES, II J.

1

When timely objections are filed to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge,
the district court must review de novo those portions of the report and recommendation to which
objection is made. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1). If there are no objections to the report and recommendation
or when reviewing those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections are
directed, the court should, as a matter of good practice, “satisfy itself that there is no clear error on
the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), advisory
committee notes; see also Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878 (3d Cir. 1987). Plaintiff did not
file timely objections, so the court has reviewed the report and recommendation for clear error.