SCHWARTZ et al v. ACCURATUS CORPORATION et al
Filing
144
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 2/21/18. 2/21/18 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
(
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
~--
BRENDA ANN SCHWARTZ and PAUL GRANT
SCHWARTZ,
Plaintiffs,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 12-6189
v.
F·ILED
ACCURATUS CORPORATION,
in its own right and as successor in interest to
Accuratus Ceramic Corporation,
18
Defendant.
[{:,
ORDER
AND NOW, thitf21-- day of February, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant's
Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 123) and all opposing and supporting
papers, and for the reasons more fully stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion,
it is herebY. ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED:
BY THE COURT:
ENT'D FEB 2 1 2018
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?