MCELROY v. SANDS CASINO

Filing 57

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE (#45) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#44) AND PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS (#43) ARE HEREBY STRICKEN. DEFENDANT 9;S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#35) IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF ON ALL COUNTS. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 1/7/14. 1/9/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DARRYL MCELROY, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-6219 SANDS CASINO, Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 7th day of January, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant Sands Casino’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket #35), as well as Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Undisputed Material Facts (Docket #45) and Plaintiff’s Response to the Motion to Strike, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant’s Motion to Strike (Docket #45) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket #44) and Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Undisputed Material Facts (Docket #43) are hereby stricken. 2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket #35) is GRANTED. 3. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff on all counts. 4. The Clerk is directed to close this case for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?