MCELROY v. SANDS CASINO
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE (#45) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#44) AND PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS (#43) ARE HEREBY STRICKEN. DEFENDANT 9;S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#35) IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF ON ALL COUNTS. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 1/7/14. 1/9/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AND NOW, this 7th day of January, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant
Sands Casino’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket #35), as well as Defendant’s
Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and
Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Undisputed Material Facts (Docket #45) and
Plaintiff’s Response to the Motion to Strike, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant’s Motion to Strike (Docket #45) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s
Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket #44) and
Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Undisputed Material Facts (Docket
#43) are hereby stricken.
2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket #35) is GRANTED.
3. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff on all
4. The Clerk is directed to close this case for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?