DAY et al v. SEARS
Filing
26
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 15 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 1/15/14. 1/16/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RODNEY DAY and KEITH BOWLES,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION
No. 12-cv-6474
v.
SEARS,
Defendant.
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND NOW, this 15th day of January 2014, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (ECF 15), Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition (ECF 17), Defendant’s Reply to
Plaintiff’s Response (ECF 18), Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant’s
Reply Brief (ECF 23), Defendant’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Opposition to
Defendant’s Reply Brief (ECF 24), and after holding oral argument on November 26, 2013, it is
hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
_______________________________
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J.
O:\CIVIL 12\12-6474 day v. sears\Order Denying D's Mot SJ.docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?