RIVERA v. ASTRUE
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE M. FAITH ANGELL ARE SUSTAINED IN PART; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE IS NOT APPROVED AND NOT ADOPTED; THIS CASE IS REMANED TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE MEMORANDUM OPINIO ISSUED THIS DATED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 3/27/2014. 3/27/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kk, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2014, upon consideration of the Plaintiff’s Brief
and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review (Document No. 11), the
defendant’s response (Document No. 12), the Report and Recommendation of United
States Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell (Document No. 18), the Plaintiff’s Objections to
the Report and Recommendation (Document No. 19), and after a thorough and
independent review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows:
Plaintiff’s objections to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge
M. Faith Angell are SUSTAINED in part;
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is NOT
APPROVED and NOT ADOPTED;
This case is REMANDED, pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C.
§405(g), to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Memorandum
Opinion issued this date.
/s/ Timothy J. Savage
TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?