SPADY v. THE BETHLEHEM AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT et al

Filing 82

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. 74) IS GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 44) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 11/29/16. 11/30/16 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICA D. SPADY,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 12-6731

v.
THE BETHLEHEM AREA SCHOOL
DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
AND NOW, this 29th day of November 2016, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion
for Reconsideration of the Court’s Order Denying Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 44, 74),
Plaintiff’s Brief in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 75),
Defendant’s Reply Brief in Support of its Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 76), Plaintiff’s
Supplemental Memorandum (Doc. No. 79), and Defendant’s Supplemental Memorandum (Doc.
No. 80), and in accordance with the Opinion of this Court issued this day, it is ORDERED that
Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 74) is GRANTED. It is FURTHER
ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 44) is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/ s / J oel H. S l om s k y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.