D.M. et al v. COUNTY OF BERKS et al

Filing 22

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT (DOC. NO.8) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 3/14/2013. 3/15/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED(kk, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
D.M. (Mother) and D.M. (Father), individually
and on behalf of J.M. and D.P.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
COUNTY OF BERKS, et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

No. 12-6762

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR A MORE
DEFINITE STATEMENT
And NOW, this 14th day of March 2013, for the reasons stated in the foregoing
memorandum, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’
Amended Complaint (ECF No. 8) is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiffs’ claim of illegal entry
against Defendants Grimes, McCollum, and High, but DENIED as to all other claims. It is
further ORDERED that Defendants’ Rule 12(e) Motion for a More Definite Statement (ECF No.
8) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
________________
Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J.
O:\CIVIL 12\12-6762 D.M. v. couty of berks\order_mtd.docx