JAFFER REACHOUT FOUNDATION v. ARABESQUE INC. et al

Filing 40

ORDER/OPINION THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (#32) IS GRANTED AND THIS MATTER IS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILING IN AN APPROPRIATE FORUM. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, AS THE CASE HAS BEEN DISMISSED, DEFENDANTS' INCLUDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ALSO CONTAINED WITHIN DOCKET #32) IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 10/15/14. 10/17/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND FORWARDED TO LEGAL.(ky, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAFFER REACHOUT FOUNDATION, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-7169 ARABESQUE INC., MOORISH INTERIORS, MORESQUE INC., MHAMMED NAJI, REDA NAJI, and ADIL M. NAJI, Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2014, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket #32), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition, and all supporting papers, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and this matter is DISMISSED for lack of personal jurisdiction, without prejudice to refiling in an appropriate forum. It is further ORDERED that, as the case has been dismissed, Defendants’ included Motion for Summary Judgment (also contained within Docket #32) is DENIED AS MOOT. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?