STONEWALL v. ASTRUE

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF, REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS REMAND ONLY. PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR REVIEW (DOC. 8) IS GRANTED IN PART AN D DENIED IN PART. THE CASE IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 1/16/14. 1/16/14 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION ROXANNE E. STONEWALL v. .., :! ' ·- CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ..._., NO. 13-451 ) '·. ,,) L,)~-"'-'-'-- ORDER AND NOW, this 16th day of January, 2014, upon careful and independent consideration of the pleadings and the record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge dated December 30, 2013, to which no objections have been filed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. JUDGMENT is ENTERED in favor of Plaintiff, REVERSING the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security for the purposes of this remand only; 3. Plaintiffs Request for Review (Docket No. 8) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; and 4. The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration in accordance with the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation; and 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case closed.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?