ARNOLD v. AUTOZONE, INC. et al

Filing 97

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT DONALD DAVIS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 60) IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT AUTOZONE, INC., AUTOZONERS, INC., AUTOZONERS, LLC, CODY BROADDUS, RICHARD GREAVES' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 61) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 3/2/2016. 3/2/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
EDWARD ARNOLD,
Plaintiff,
v.
AUTOZONE, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 13-1329

ORDER
AND NOW, this 2nd day of March, 2016, upon consideration of Defendant Donald
Davis’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 60), Defendant AutoZone, Inc.,
AutoZoners, Inc., AutoZoners, LLC, Cody Broaddus, Richard Greaves’ motion for
summary judgment (Doc. No. 61) and all responses and replies thereto, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED that:
1.

Defendant Donald Davis’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 60) is

GRANTED.
2.

Defendant AutoZone, Inc., AutoZoners, Inc., AutoZoners, LLC, Cody

Broaddus, Richard Greaves’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 61) is
GRANTED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.