YODER et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. et al

Filing 22

ORDER THAT DEFEDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS ARE GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF MY ORDER DENYING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND PERMISSION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR STAY OF THE STATE FORECLOSURE ACTION IS DENIED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF ITS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED. PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF ITS MOTION TO STAY THE STATE OF FORECLOSURE ACTION IS DENIED. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED; ETC. ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 10/9/13. 10/10/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(jl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CYNTHIA M. YODER, et. al., Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et. al. Defendants. : : : : : : : : : Civil Action No. 13-cv-1377 ORDER AND NOW, this 9th day of October 2013, upon consideration of the Defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. Nos. 4 and 5) and Plaintiffs’ response thereto (Doc. No. 7), and the various motions filed by plaintiffs, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants motions to dismiss (Doc. Nos. 4 and 5) are GRANTED with prejudice; 2. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of my order denying appointment of counsel and permission to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED; 3. Plaintiff’s motion for stay of the state foreclosure action (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED; 4. Plaintiff’s motion for determination of its motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 19) is DENIED; 5. Plaintiffs motion for determination of its motion to stay the state foreclosure action (Doc. No. 15) is DENIED; 6. The clerk is directed to mark this case CLOSED. BY THE COURT /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?