BOURNE v. SUPERINTENDANT OF GRATERFORD PA PRISON et al
Filing
18
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED AS MOOT; THE MOTION TO WITHDRAW REPRESENTATION IS GRANTED; THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. CURTIS JOYNER ON 10/15/14. 10/15/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (jpd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROBERT M. BOURNE
CIVIL ACTION
v.
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, Superintendent,
SCI-Graterford, et. al.
NO. 13-1408
Old 1'ipon careful and independent
,
consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254, Respondents' answer, and appointed counsel's motion to withdraw
representation, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey, IT IS ORDERED that:
1.
The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2.
The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254 is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
3.
The motion to withdraw representation is GRANTED.
3.
There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?