MAQAGI v. HORIZON LAMPS, INC. et al

Filing 81

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN TERMS OF RULE 25 "FILING AND SERVICE," FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE TITLE VII, GENERAL PROVISIONS: ARGUMENT THAT APPEALS COURT HAS FULL JURSIDICTION, WHICH THE COURT CONSTRUES AS MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A NOTICE OF APPEAL, AND ALL RESPONSES AND REPLIES IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 12/9/16. 12/13/16 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL AND COPY TO LEGAL.(jaa, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WONGA MAQAGI

v.

C.A. NO. 13-1573

HORIZON LAMPS, INC, et al.

ORDER
AND NOW, this 9th day of December, 2016, upon consideration of the plaintiff’s
motion in terms of Rule 25 “Filing and Service,” Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Title VII,
General Provisions: Argument that Appeals Court has Full Jurisdiction, which the Court
construes as a motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal, and all responses and
replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion [Doc. 77] is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, J.

1