NAGY et al v. ST. LUKE'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al
Filing
33
OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT LUKE'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 4 ), IS GRANTED BECAUSE THE COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION OVER THIS CASE. THEREFORE, THE CASE IS DISMISSED AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 4/3/2014. 4/3/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SES AND E-MAILED.(amas)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOSEPH NAGY et al.,
Plaintiffs,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 13-1588
v.
ST. LUKE'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 3rd day of April 2014, upon consideration of Defendant St. Luke’s
Hospital’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 4), Plaintiffs’ Response to St. Luke’s University Hospital
or if Indeed Incorrectly Pled St. Luke Warren Hospital’s Memorandum of Law and Motions and
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss and Counterclaim with Joinder of Causes and Parties Against
Manor Care of Easton Pa LLC (Doc. No. 12), and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court
issued this day, it is ORDERED that:
Defendant St. Luke’s Hospital’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 4) is GRANTED because
the Court does not have subject-matter jurisdiction over this case. Therefore, the case is
dismissed as to all Defendants.
The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/ s/ J oel H. S l om sk y
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?