NAGY et al v. ST. LUKE'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al

Filing 33

OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT LUKE'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 4 ), IS GRANTED BECAUSE THE COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION OVER THIS CASE. THEREFORE, THE CASE IS DISMISSED AS TO ALL DEFENDANTS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 4/3/2014. 4/3/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SES AND E-MAILED.(amas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSEPH NAGY et al., Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-1588 v. ST. LUKE'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL et al., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 3rd day of April 2014, upon consideration of Defendant St. Luke’s Hospital’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 4), Plaintiffs’ Response to St. Luke’s University Hospital or if Indeed Incorrectly Pled St. Luke Warren Hospital’s Memorandum of Law and Motions and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss and Counterclaim with Joinder of Causes and Parties Against Manor Care of Easton Pa LLC (Doc. No. 12), and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED that:  Defendant St. Luke’s Hospital’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 4) is GRANTED because the Court does not have subject-matter jurisdiction over this case. Therefore, the case is dismissed as to all Defendants.  The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: / s/ J oel H. S l om sk y JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J. 10

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?