MOHAMMED v. GAVIN et al
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE AND DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND THERE IS NO PROBABLE CASUE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 12/10/13. 12/10/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WAYNE J. GAVIN, et al.,
AND NOW, this
- , 2013, upon careful and independent
consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed February 25, 2013; the Response to
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed November 1, 2013; and after review of the Report and
Recommendation ("R&R") ofUnited States Magistrate Judge HenryS. Perkin dated November
7, 2013, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
the R&R is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED with prejudice and
DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; and
there is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?