GOLDENSTEIN v. REPOSSESSORS INC. et al

Filing 54

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO BRING ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO THE COURT'S ATTENTION IS GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFEN DANTS, REPOSSESSORS, INC., CHAD LATVAAHO, SHADY OAK ENTERPRISES, INC., DOING BUSINESS AS PREMIER FINANCE ADJUSTERS, AND PHILIP HOURICAN, AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF, HEIKO GOLDENSTEIN, ON PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 7/17/14. 7/17/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(er, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
HEIKO GOLDENSTEIN,
Plaintiff
vs.
REPOSSESSORS, INC.;
CHAD LATVAAHO;
SHADY OAK ENTERPRISES, INC.,
doing business as PREMIER
FINANCE ADJUSTERS; and
PHILIP J. HOURICAN,
Defendants

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil Action
No. 13-cv-02797

O R D E R
NOW, this 17th day of July, 2014, upon consideration of
the following documents:
(1)

Motion for Summary Judgment on Behalf of
Defendants, Repossessors, Inc., Chad
Latvaaho, and Shady Oak Enterprises, Inc.,
d/b/a Premier Finance Adjusters, which
motion was filed April 11, 2014
(Document 35); together with
Brief in Support of Motion for Summary
Judgment on Behalf of Defendants,
Repossessors, Inc., Chad Latvaaho, and
Shady Oak Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a
Premier Finance Adjusters, which brief
was filed April 11, 2014
(Document 35-9);

(2)

Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition to Motion
for Summary Judgment, which response was
filed May 5, 2014 (Document 40); together
with
Heiko Goldenstein’s Memorandum of Law
in Opposition to Motion for Summary

Judgment, which memorandum was filed
May 5, 2014 (Document 40-1);
(3)

Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Summary
Judgment on Behalf of Defendants,
Repossessors, Inc., Chad Latvaaho, and Shady
Oak Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Premier Finance
Adjusters, which reply brief was filed by
defendants on June 19, 2014 (Document 45);
and

(4)

Plaintiff’s Motion to Bring Additional
Authority to the Court’s Attention, which
motion was filed July 16, 2014
(Document 46);

and for the reasons expressed in the accompanying Opinion,
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to bring
additional authority to the court’s attention is granted.
IT IS ORDERED that defendants’ motion for summary
judgment is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in
favor of defendants, Repossessors, Inc., Chad Latvaaho, Shady
Oak Enterprises, Inc., doing business as Premier Finance
Adjusters, and Philip Hourican, and against plaintiff, Heiko
Goldenstein, on plaintiff’s Complaint.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall
mark this case closed for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ____
James Knoll Gardner
United States District Judge
-ii-