MILLER v. KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY et al
Filing
19
ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINTS IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 12/10/2013. 12/12/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RHONDA MILLER,
Plaintiff,
v.
KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY and
DR. ROBERT REYNOLDS,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 13-3993
ORDER
AND NOW, this 10th day of December, 2013, upon consideration of Defendant
Kutztown University’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint (Doc. No. 11) and any
responses thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that Kutztown University’s motion is
DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?